Denying Darwin: Views on science in the rejection of evolution

From Public Understanding of Science

The Evolution Theory of Charles Darwin has met with considerable opposition, notably from religious circles since its day of publication. This article tries to understand the evolution controversy by reframing it as a phenomenon of public understanding of science.In this paper, three main paradigms concern­ing the relation between science and the general public (the paradigm of scientific literacy, of public understanding of science (PUS) and of science and society) are distilled from 25 years of PUS research. This article presents findings concerning the images of science of Christians who reject evolution, as understood from a public understanding of science framework. This study focuses on interviews with a selection of Dutch Christians.  The reframing of the evolution–creation controversy in the field of public understanding of science gives insight in how the rejection of evolution by Christians relates to certain images of science.

Abstract

Evolution has met with considerable religious opposition for 150 years and is still controversial among various religious groups. This article tries to understand the evolution controversy by reframing it as a phenomenon of public understanding of science. Three paradigms were used as hypotheses for the rejection of evolution by Dutch Protestant Christians: knowledge deficit, attitude deficit and trust deficit. Ten Dutch Protestants rejecting evolution were interviewed about their views concerning evolution and science. It was found that the main reason for rejecting evolution was an a priori decision to trust the Bible more than science. Any views on science and evolution were based on this decision, so all three hypotheses, which suggest an a posteriori decision, were found to be not sufficient to explain the rejection of evolution, even though both a knowledge deficit and a trust deficit were found for some participants. However, all respondents felt that their a priori decision was supported by scientific facts. All respondents stated that evolution does not meet the criteria for good science and is therefore as unscientific as the belief in creation. Excluding evolution from science allows the respondents to retain their positive attitudes towards science.

 

Read this article for free

 

Article details
Peter Hildering, Luca Consoli,  and Riyan van den Born
Denying Darwin: Views on science in the rejection of evolution by Dutch Protestants Public Understanding of Science 0963662512437328, first published on April 11, 2012 doi:10.1177/0963662512437328

 

 

 

 

     
This entry was posted in SAGE Insight, Science, Theology and Biblical Studies and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply