Connecting with the community: Researchers on the economic benefits of marijuana tourism


Bailey Baumann

Dr. Soo Kang is an Associate Professor in the Hospitality Management Program at Colorado State University (CSU). Her main research area is consumer behaviors in the hospitality and tourism areas. She has conducted research studies on residents’ quality of life issues in gambling communities, on visitor profiling at an international event and festival, and on marijuana tourism. She has published 40 peer-reviewed articles in flagship journals within the field of hospitality and tourism management: Journal of Travel Research, Tourism Geographies, Tourism Management, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, and Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, among others. She is also an author of a book chapter on gambling management, ‘Land based Casino Gambling: Case of Colorado and South Dakota,’ in the book titled, ‘The History of Gambling in America.’ She is a CHE (Certified Hospitality Educator) designated by the American Hotel & Lodging Educational Institute (AHLEI).

Jeffrey P. Miller has twenty years’ experience in the food service industry and is currently associate professor and program director for the Hospitality Management program at Colorado State University.  He was a chef in the Kansas City area for most of his culinary career and did his culinary internship at the American Restaurant in Kansas City.  Dr. Miller received his formal culinary training at New England Culinary Institute and holds a Master’s Degree from Kansas State University in Hotel, Restaurant and Institution Management and a Doctorate in Educational Leadership from Colorado State University. 

In light of the recent legalization of marijuana for recreational and medicinal purposes in several states, we were curious to learn more from two authors of the SAGE Open article, “From Forbidden Fruit to the Goose that Lays Golden Eggs: Marijuana Tourism in Colorado.”

Q. How do you define marijuana tourism? Who takes part in it?

Soo Kang, Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University

Soo Kang

Marijuana tourism is a special interest tourism (SIT) that includes the consumption of marijuana as component of the total tourist experience at a destination. It includes not only those who come to a place because of the availability of marijuana, but also those who choose to consume it as a secondary activity while visiting a place where it is legal.

Q. For readers who are not as familiar with these controversies surrounding marijuana tourism, could you please summarize the main arguments for and against the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?

The most popular argument from supporters are its economic impacts. Marijuana products are heavily taxed, and its tax revenues are expected to be significant for state governments. For example, Colorado collected $135 million in tax and fees from the marijuana industry in 2015. The tax and fee revenues were distributed into regulatory and public-safety efforts, rural school construction, and youth drug prevention and abuse programs. Additionally, the marijuana industry is expected to create more jobs and to stimulate direct and indirect economic activities in states. Also, legalization will free up some law enforcement resources for redeployment in non-drug offense areas.

Opponents of legalization focus mostly on  the drug’s long-term physical and mental health effects, including the brain development and addiction problems of youth and children. Other negative social costs include increased school suspensions, marijuana-related traffic deaths, pet poisonings, lab explosions, and drug-related crimes committed outside the legal parameters of recreational or medical marijuana.

In the tourism context, marijuana is still classified as an illegal drug at a federal level and has a social stigma attached to it. Some states may be driving away tourists who disdain marijuana. For example, some opponents in Colorado claimed that legalization has discouraged family-oriented and health-conscious tourists as visitors to the state.

Q. What can states learn from studying the economic benefits of marijuana tourism in Colorado two years after legalization? What effects will they have to wait longer to see?

Miller, Jeff Best Teacher Award, 2006-2007 Assistant Professor Food Science and Human Nutrition Colorado State University January 26, 2007

Jeffrey P. Miller

It is natural that when controversial issues (e.g., gambling, marijuana) are discussed from a legal perspective, many proponents use positive economic impacts as a strong advocate point because it is easy to measure and persuasive to justify the legalization. Direct economic impacts such as tax revenue, sales volume, job creation, etc. have been reported upon and analyzed since legalization. As noted above, The Marijuana Policy Group (associated with the University of Colorado – College of Business) issued a study in October 2016 suggesting that the marijuana industry has created 18,000 new full-time job equivalencies and has directly and indirectly generated $2.4 billion in economic activity in Colorado. Outside the direct sales channel, there has been job growth in warehouse activities, lighting and irrigation companies, and an increase in services to the industry like lawyers, book-keepers, etc.

Tax revenues are already three times that of those coming from alcohol sales and projections are for marijuana taxes to outstrip cigarette taxes by 2020.

There is not enough economic data supporting or disputing to what extent the marijuana industry may have influenced hospitality and tourism industry. We need more hard numbers to evaluate its contribution to various economic activities associated with hospitality and tourism.

More importantly, along with economic impacts, social impacts (costs) should be counterweighted to draw a full picture in evaluating the success of legalization. Assessing social costs in tourism developments is challenging in that they are not as explicit as economic impacts, takes longer time to measure, and can be subjective. Understanding the social impacts on visitors, residents, destinations, and states is something that needs to be done in the long term.

Q. In your article, “From Forbidden Fruit to the Goose that Lays the Golden Eggs: Marijuana Tourism in Colorado,” you listed several research areas for hospitality and tourism researchers to explore. Of these, which do you think are the most critical?

As we are in an early stage of development, we believe there are two areas that deserve immediate attentions from researchers and industry professionals. First, we need to understand who those visitors are to marijuana tourism markets. From a tourism perspective, it is critical to profile visitors’ demographic, social, and psychographic characteristics. Like other tourism segments, their perceptions and behaviors during their vacations or visits will render important cues to understand this unique market.

Second, researchers should also investigate how residents have taken in this law change. They are the ones who voted for legalization but also the ones who are affected by various impacts, including negative social and cultural impacts, from an influx of visitors. Comparison of before and after perception of legalization among residents would generate an interesting picture of how host communities have perceived the aftermath of the legalization. This topic can be investigated with quality of life issues, which eventually affect residents’ support for future development with the legalization.

Q. This election season, several states had the legalization of marijuana (whether for medicinal or recreational purposes) on their ballots. In what ways do you think the results will impact the movement to legalize marijuana in the nation?

As of November 10, 2016, four additional states, California, Nevada, Maine, and Massachusetts, all voted in favor of legalized use, sale, and consumption of recreational marijuana, making 2016 a watershed year for recreational marijuana legalization. In particular, the passage of legalization in California will be viewed as a “tipping point” toward ending prohibition nationally. California is the world’s sixth largest economy, only outpaced by the US as a whole, China, Japan, Germany, and the UK. Tax revenue from recreational marijuana legalization in California is estimated to be between $1 and $1.5 billion. This level of increased tax revenue will likely make other states consider legalization as a viable economic development activity in their state.

All eight states with legalized recreational marijuana so far had legalized medical marijuana for several years preceding the approval of recreational marijuana. In the November 2016 election cycle, three further states, Florida, North Dakota, and Arkansas, approved medical marijuana initiatives. These states may see medical marijuana legalization as a stepping stone for future legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes. For some states, it is no longer a matter of ‘whether or not’ they legalize it; it becomes more ‘how’ they implement the legalization.

It seems inevitable that more states will legalize recreational marijuana. For the foreseeable future, we estimate that less than 50% of the states that will legalize marijuana due to nature of social mores in those states, but with many states clamoring for new revenue streams, this may be an over-estimation. Until most states have legalized marijuana for medical and/or recreational purposes, we do not anticipate the federal government relaxing its regulatory stance.

Q. As the legalization of marijuana continues to become more widespread, how might the marijuana tourism industry change?

As more states legalized recreational marijuana in 2016, we will see significant changes in a dynamic landscape of the marijuana tourism market. First, there will more competition for the marijuana tourist dollars. As more states legalize there will be less of an impact factor in choosing a destination that does allow it. Therefore, a novelty effect enjoyed by early adopting states, Colorado, Washington, Oregon, and Alaska, will wear off eventually as more people have an access to recreational marijuana legally or closer to their own jurisdictions. Therefore, the early adopting states should come up with long-terms plans on how to maintain or develop the industry in a sustainable way, weathering future competitions and addressing health and social problems.

Along with declining prices for recreational marijuana as competition increases, it is likely that the consumption will increase. Mark Twain once said, ‘When everyone is looking for gold, it is a good time to be in the pick and shovel business.’ We think the hospitality and tourism industry can take advantage from this green rush by understanding the market well and finding a niche market for their own profitability.

The widespread of legalization will almost certainly change the public’s perceptions about marijuana consumption. Negative stigma attached to marijuana will likely shrink, but the tourism industry in conjunction with marijuana industry should educate the public about careful consumption. This way, the industry will evolve in a sustainable way for a longer term. Finally, more systematic and constructive tourism research agendas should be developed and implemented to understand this unique but still controversial tourism segment.

The Connecting with the Community series is a collection of interviews with industry experts and forward-thinking minds on topics such as discoverability, research methods, librarianship, tips for writing and researching and the peer review process. Find out more about our Connecting with the Community series here and read past Connecting with the Community posts here.

This entry was posted in Politics, SAGE Connection. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply