William H. Starbuck on How Journals Can Improve Research Practices in Social Science

By Cynthia Nalevanko, Editor, Management INK, SAGE Publishing

This piece was originally posted in Management INK, a blog highlighting top scholarship and catering to academics, researchers and practitioners in the Management and Business fields.

This year marks the 60th Anniversary of Administrative Science Quarterly, presenting an opportunity to not only celebrate the success of the fullsizerenderjournal and anticipate the promise of what the future holds, but also an opportunity to reflect on areas where the editorial process could be improved. In his essay, “60th Anniversary Essay: How Journals Could Improve Research Practices in Social Science,” published in the Administrative Science Quarterly, William H. Starbuck considers some imperfect properties of current editorial practices and methodology in the social sciences.

ASQ CoverThe abstract from his essay:

This essay proposes ways to improve editorial evaluations of manuscripts and to make published research more reliable and trustworthy. It points to troublesome properties of current editorial practices and suggests that editorial evaluations could become more reliable by making more allowance for reviewers’ human limitations. The essay also identifies some troublesome properties of prevalent methodology, such as statistical significance tests, HARKing, and p-Hacking, and proposes editorial policies to mitigate these detrimental behaviors.

The article “60th Anniversary Essay: How Journals Could Improve Research Practices in Social Science” is from Administrative Science QuarterlyWant to know all about the latest research from Administrative Science Quarterly? Click here to sign up for e-alerts!

*Gould Reading Room picture credited to eflon (CC)
This entry was posted in SAGE Connection, Tips for You. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply